7+ Winning FMLA Interference Cases & Examples

cases where employees win fmla interference claims

7+ Winning FMLA Interference Cases & Examples

Successful Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) interference claims typically involve situations where an employer denies, discourages, or otherwise interferes with an employee’s attempt to exercise their rights under the law. For instance, an employee might prevail if their employer refuses to grant leave for a qualifying medical condition, despite providing sufficient medical certification. Another example would be an employer terminating an employee for taking FMLA leave, despite the leave being properly requested and approved.

Understanding the nuances of successful legal challenges provides valuable insights for both employees and employers. For employees, it clarifies what constitutes interference and strengthens their ability to protect their rights. For employers, it underscores the importance of FMLA compliance, mitigating the risk of costly litigation and promoting a positive work environment. The FMLA’s history of protecting employees’ job security during times of medical necessity highlights the significance of understanding these legal precedents.

Read more

6+ Signs of Tortious Interference With Employment & Claims

tortious interference with employment

6+ Signs of Tortious Interference With Employment & Claims

This wrongful action occurs when a third party intentionally disrupts an existing or prospective employment relationship, causing economic harm. For example, a competitor might maliciously spread false rumors about an employee to their current employer, leading to termination. Alternatively, they might induce an employee to breach a contract and leave their job for a competing firm.

Protecting established and potential employment relationships is crucial for economic stability and individual livelihoods. Historically, common law has recognized the importance of safeguarding these relationships from malicious external influences. Legal recourse against such damaging interference not only compensates the wronged party but also deters harmful business practices, fostering fair competition and a stable labor market.

Read more